Skip to content

chore(deps): update rust crate zip to v9.0.1 - #15220

Merged
cakebaker merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
renovate/zip-9.x-lockfile
Oct 10, 2026
Merged

cakebaker merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
renovate/zip-9.x-lockfile

chore(deps): update rust crate zip to v9.0.1

248bbff
Select commit
Loading
Failed to load commit list.
CodSpeed / CodSpeed Performance Analysis failed Oct 10, 2026 in 0s

2 benchmarks regressed

⚠️ 120 benchmarks spent significant time in system calls

System calls cannot be consistently instrumented, so they are not included in the measure, which understates the real cost. Please switch to the Walltime instrument to accurately measure system calls.

Measurement and system calls

ℹ️ 1 benchmark has no flame graph

The flamegraph could not be generated because too much time was spent in runtime internals, making the visualization not useful for performance analysis.

⚠️ Different runtime environments detected

Some benchmarks with significant performance changes were compared across different runtime environments,
which may affect the accuracy of the results.

Open the report in CodSpeed to investigate

⚡ 5 improved benchmarks
❌ 2 regressed benchmarks
✅ 394 untouched benchmarks
⏩ 54 skipped benchmarks1

Warning

Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.

Performance Changes

Mode Benchmark BASE HEAD Efficiency
❌ Simulation expand_many_lines[100000] 106.2 ms 115.9 ms -8.36%
❌ Simulation expand_custom_tabstops[50000] 29.6 ms 31.6 ms -6.36%
⚡ Simulation unexpand_large_file[10] 280.9 ms 105.3 ms ×2.7
⚡ Simulation unexpand_many_lines[100000] 134.4 ms 50.6 ms ×2.7
⚡ Simulation three_39_bit_primes 924.5 ms 465.8 ms +98.47%
⚡ Simulation five_38_bit_primes 1.9 s 1.6 s +14.94%
⚡ Simulation thirteen_39_bit_primes 9.2 s 8.9 s +4.3%

Tip

Investigate this regression by commenting @codspeedbot fix this regression on this PR, or directly use the CodSpeed MCP with your agent.


Comparing renovate/zip-9.x-lockfile (248bbff) with main (7df8692)2

Open in CodSpeed

Footnotes

  1. 54 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩

  2. No successful run was found on main (83d4759) during the generation of this report, so 7df8692 was used instead as the comparison base. There might be some changes unrelated to this pull request in this report. ↩