Skip to content

Drop GHA cache from Docker builds - #955

Merged
mxpv merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
claude/project-thread-j9tc35
Oct 21, 2026
Merged

mxpv merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
claude/project-thread-j9tc35

Conversation

@mxpv

@mxpv mxpv commented Oct 21, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

The nightly workflow has failed every day since Sep 12 at COPY . . with
BlobNotFound (404): the buildx GHA cache references an evicted blob, so
:nightly on ghcr has gone stale. A fresh cache scope only helped once; the
next run hit the same missing blob. release.yml uses the same cache and
would fail on the next tag too.

This removes the GHA cache from both workflows. An uncached multi-arch build
takes about 10-12 minutes, within the 20-minute timeout.

@mxpv mxpv self-assigned this Oct 21, 2026

mxpv commented Oct 21, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

The claude-review check failure isn't from this diff. The Claude Code action exited 0.3s after starting with is_error: true, zero turns and $0 cost, so it errored before reviewing anything (most likely an API key or account issue). No fix exists in the repo for this, and this PR only touches workflow cache settings. I've re-run the job once.


Generated by Claude Code

@mxpv
mxpv force-pushed the claude/project-thread-j9tc35 branch 4 times, most recently from ae45a84 to 6c4754d Compare October 21, 2026 22:48
@mxpv mxpv changed the title Use scoped GHA cache for Docker builds Drop GHA cache from Docker builds Oct 21, 2026
@mxpv
mxpv force-pushed the claude/project-thread-j9tc35 branch 2 times, most recently from 31500b5 to 94534af Compare October 21, 2026 23:02
The buildx GHA cache keeps pointing at an evicted blob, so builds fail
with BlobNotFound on COPY even with a fresh cache scope. Build without
the cache in nightly and release; an uncached multi-arch build fits in
the timeout.
@mxpv
mxpv force-pushed the claude/project-thread-j9tc35 branch from 94534af to fd2916b Compare October 21, 2026 23:02
@mxpv
mxpv merged commit 5db9ea5 into main Oct 21, 2026
13 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants